I have waited far too long…..I think the time has come for me to publish this on my blog.
I am a graduate of Maulana Azad Medical College. This piece is addressed to my friends, colleagues, seniors and juniors in the medical fraternity who have taken up cudgels against the reservation policy.
In an utopian society, reservation should have no place. In an ideal world where universal primary and secondary education is easily accessible and available not just on paper but in practice as well, and where centuries of deep rooted caste based malice has evaporated, reservation will no longer be required. Yet let’s not forget that 21 st century India is far far away from that notion. Lost out in the shrill cries of a few thousand people of the most privileged strata of our society, lavishly sponsored by big private hospitals and lapped up by a biased media (a news anchor on NDTV announces “admission to professional colleges got even more difficult for all of you”-the shocking assumption being that all those listening are nonSC/ST/OBCs); is the deafening silence of the millions of socially and educationally downtrodden in the villages and towns of India. The SCs, STs and OBCs. I don’t doubt the genuineness or intentions of my colleagues’ protests. I lament their ignorance and the shallowness of their arguments.
You say casteism and untouchability don’t exist in India? Haven’t you heard of the Dalit girl who was refused entry in an Orissa school and now attends classes under police escort? Or of an OBC labourer in a remote district of Bihar whose house was burnt down by upper caste hooligans only because he had dared to name his child “Vikramaditya” -a name reserved for upper caste boys. Isolated cases? Perhaps. Or is it because numerous other such cases go unreported by the electronic and print media? Still in doubt? Skim through the classifieds section of your Sunday newspaper.
You assert quite brazenly that you have never indulged in casteism. Think again. How many of us can claim that we have never ever insidiously referred to our Dalit colleagues as “Shaddus”? For those of you who might be unaware of it, the Constitution defines it as practising untouchability.
A common refrain over the past three weeks, indulged in by all and sundry, was “Would you like to be treated by an SC/ST/OBC doctor?” the triviality and the callousness in the manner in which the question was phrased couldn’t hide the grotesquely distorted thinking behind it. Besides the obvious fact that it smacks of casteism at face value, perhaps more disturbingly, it seeks to equate professional competence (or the lack of it) with a particular category of people. The insinuation being that SC/ST/OBC doctors are inherently and intrinsically incompetent. We are thus entering the realm of race-based discrimination. Perhaps casteism was not bad enough.
And if any one of us dares to answer the above question as “NO” the responsibility and the accompanying guilt will have to be borne by each and every one of us. Incidentally, the very fact that we are debating this question is proof that caste and caste based discrimination is thriving in contemporary India. Using the above argument to proclaim that reservation is useless, as it has had “no effect” even 59 years after independence is a case of erroneous circular logic. Can centuries of discrimination and inequality be eradicated merely by 60 years of half-hearted efforts? Reservation might not be the panacea for all ills but isn’t it to premature to jump to the conclusion that caste based reservation serves no purpose? No system is perfect, least of all one that seeks to distinguish human being from human being. Yet, an extra-ordinary situation demands an extra-ordinary response. The only antidote to snake venom is itself a poison. The implementation of the present reservation policy is beset with flaws-ambiguous criteria for the creamy layer, exclusion of SCs/STs from its ambit, rampant corruption in the procurement of the necessary certificates, a case for the inclusion of the economically deprived among the forward castes, disagreement over whether to limit reservation only at the entry level, etc. These are however modalities which can (and should) be debated about and rectified in due course of time. The principle behind reservation is however irrevocable. Blood loss and pain inflicted by the necessary amputation of a gangrenous limb can’t nullify the inevitability of the amputation.
Criticizing reservation as it allegedly perpetuates casteism is even more absurd. It is akin to saying that different classes of berths available in the railways perpetuate economic inequalities. Caste is an omnipresent albeit bitter fact of our lives and reservation merely reflects that.
Don’t for a moment believe that you are fooling anyone but yourselves by hiding behind the charade of “Youth for Equality”. Equality amongst whom? Can a government school educated child of illiterate parents brought up in adverse economic circumstances in a far-flung hamlet of India, subject to casteism and ostracism by his upper caste compatriots ever compete on equal terms with somebody like you or me? As Aristotle said, equality among unequals is akin to inequality among equals. Check the demographic profile of students in your college. At least in the medical colleges of Delhi, upper caste students fill in 90-95% of the general category seats. This when the proportion of OBC’s in the country’s population is at least 30%. Until and unless this anomaly is rectified, equality will remain a myth. Even the handful of SC/ST/OBC students who despite all odds get admission under the general category are forced to hide their true identity from their upper caste mates for fear of ostracism and boycott. Even worse it is implicitly assumed that they belong to the upper castes and are thus compelled to acquiesce in SC/ST/OBC bashing which is the vaunt in most of the formal and informal conversations (and I speak from personal experience). You still find it incomprehensible that a SC/ST/OBC student can successfully compete with you and yet you preach the same under the spurious banner of “Medicos for Equality”. If you define equality as making someone ashamed of his identity and forcing him to pretend to belong to the hallowed portals of the upper caste, then yes you have succeeded. Left rudderless and identityless however, their actual fate is pathetic. They can neither affiliate with their SC/SC/OBC brethren nor will they ever be completely accepted as part of your group. The plight of those who come in through reservation is even worse. If they excel, they obviously didn’t need reservation. If they don’t, they don’t deserve to be here.
You say merit will be compromised if reservation is allowed. Lets start with the very concept of ‘merit’. Is it some innate, mythical quality that all those who clear a competitive exam as general category students possess (and those who don’t, do not)? I think not. ‘Merit’ connotes the ability to ‘crack’ these examinations. It connotes the ability to successfully tackle the kind of questions that appear in these examinations-mainly objective type. Almost all competitive exams test skills that have been cultivated in families, honed by public schools and fine-tuned by coaching institutes. It is these skills that constitute ‘merit’ for the purpose of a competitive examination, not the aptitude for success in the profession that the exam seeks to recruit candidates for. And obviously the SC/ST/OBC students will score low on such measures of ‘merit’. That is the whole argument in favour of reservation-they need reservation precisely because most of them cannot compete on ‘merit’ with (most of the) general category students. They are unable to compete on ‘merit’, not because of any intrinsic deficiency, but because they have not been exposed to the requisite training for inculcating and developing such ‘merit’-at home, in schools, in coaching institutes, in society. Thank God reservation compromises on ‘merit’ of this kind.
I am not for a moment suggesting that such a system of recruitment is completely flawed, neither do I have a viable alternative. All I am saying that it is not foolproof. Far from it. Then there is the question of the relationship between ‘merit’ and professional competence (or the lack of it). Can anyone give me figures to prove that ‘meritorious’ students necessarily turn out to be the best in their fields? Conversely, can anyone furnish proof that all SC/ST students who enter through reservation (and OBCs who will enter in future) are (or will turn out to be) failures? (Remember, even under reservation, the principle of ‘merit’ is being followed. An SC/ST/OBC candidate is not selected merely for existing. He/she has to compete with other members in his/her category).
I will take my own example. I entered MAMC through the general quota of DPMT. Within a few months, I realised that I wasn’t cut out for medicine. Apparently, I had ‘MERIT’, but not quite the ‘APTITUDE’. Shouldn’t I have been tested on such parameters as (potential) clinical ability and empathy for patients instead of prowess in tackling MCQs in Physics, Chemistry and Biology?
You believe that reservation is nothing but a case of political gamesmanship and vote bank politics. Perhaps, though not quite in the same sense. Several articles in the constitution-15 (4), 338, 340, etc.-make it amply clear that the adoption of specific provisions relating to positive discrimination was not just an overwhelming social necessity but also the collective mandate of the constitution framers. Post independence, the first backward class commission, set up in the 50’s made sweeping recommendations which were far more excessive than those being debated today. Yet its provisions relating to the SCs/STs alone were implemented. The Mandal commission submitted its recommendations in 1980. 12 years were to lapse before the VP Singh government accepted its recommendations, but again only partially. It was the Mandal commission itself that had recommended reservation for the OBCs not just in central government jobs but also in educational institutions. The process that has started today is at least 25 years late. Again, the figure of 27% recommended by the commission for such reservation was much less that its actual estimate of the proportion of OBC population (around 50%) but was done only to adhere to the Supreme Court directive limiting the quantum of reservation of all forms to not more than 50%. So contrary to popular belief this process is a logical corollary of a long standing socio-political movement which, if it is now showing some results, is not due to political gerrymandering and vote bank politics, but despite it.
Those of us who claim that social upliftment should be left to the goodwill and largesse of educational institutions, corporate houses and industries (under the garb of affirmative action) need to have a re-think. What prevented them from adopting such measures until now? What has not worked till now may never work. What has started showing results-however miniscule or symbolic-in merely 60 years still might. Even if reservation is deemed to be a failure after just 100 years, we wont be any worse off. At least give it a chance.
Post Script: I informed a very dear friend of mine that the percentage of OBCs in professional institutes and even the quantum of reservation being contemplated-27%-is smaller than their actual percentage in the country’s population (anywhere between 30-50%). Pat came his chilling response-”Perhaps. But this (reservation) gives them the incentive to breed even more”
Note-I wrote this about a year back, at the height of the anti-quota protests. In hindsight, I think the tone could have been a little less abrasive. I have however, refrained from altering the tone because it would have affected the spontaneity as well.